Export limit exceeded: 16041 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16041 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-66090 | 1 Apereo Foundation | 1 Openequella | 2026-10-29 | N/A |
| In openEQUELLA before 2026.1, the XML parser used for item metadata does not disable external entity resolution. A user permitted to create items (CREATE_ITEM) can submit crafted XML to POST /api/item and cause the server to read arbitrary files accessible to the openEQUELLA service, or make requests to attacker-specified locations (SSRF), including cloud instance metadata services. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66091 | 1 Apereo Foundation | 1 Openequella | 2026-10-29 | N/A |
| In openEQUELLA before 2026.1, the GET /api/userquery/userinfobackup endpoint performs no authentication or authorisation check. An unauthenticated attacker who supplies another user's uniqueId can retrieve that user's stored personal details (username, first name, last name and email address) within the same institution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115392 | 1 Bytecodealliance | 1 Wasmtime | 2026-10-29 | 7.9 High |
| Wasmtime before 24.0.13, 25.0.0 before 36.0.14, 37.0.0 before 46.0.3, and 47.0.0 before 47.0.4 allows a filesystem sandbox escape in wasmtime-wasi because its cap-std dependency mishandles symlinks with trailing slashes on macOS and Linux kernels lacking openat2. A guest with write access to any sandboxed directory can read and write any host-accessible file, and read-only guests may read host files via preexisting symlinks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115362 | 1 Openbao | 1 Openbao | 2026-10-29 | 2.2 Low |
| OpenBao before 2.6.4 and 2.7.x before 2.7.1 does not check Secret ID expiration at use in the AppRole auth method, leaving expired Secret IDs valid until the periodic tidy removes them. An attacker holding an expired, untidied Secret ID can log in and gain access beyond its TTL. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114605 | 1 Rthalley | 1 Dnspython | 2026-10-29 | 7.5 High |
| dnspython is a DNS toolkit for Python. Prior to 2.9.0, dns.name.from_wire_parser follows attacker-controlled DNS compression pointer chains without a hop limit. A malicious DNS wire-format message can force excessive pointer traversal during name decompression, causing high CPU use, application degradation, or denial of service in applications that process untrusted DNS messages. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103394 | 1 Juniper | 1 Session Smart Router | 2026-10-29 | 3.7 Low |
| An Improper Initialization vulnerability in the SSR software in Juniper Networks Session Smart Router allows an attacker to decrypt traffic or cause a denial of service via security policy assignment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3583 | 1 Wso2 | 12 Api Control Plane, Api Manager, Identity Server and 9 more | 2026-10-29 | 3.1 Low |
| When the `allowed_scopes` configuration is enabled, the OAuth2 token introspection mechanism does not immediately invalidate a token in the cache after a revocation request. This results in a scenario where an access token that was introspected immediately before a revocation request may be returned again to the client after revocation, until the relevant cache entry is cleared. The security consequence is that a revoked access token may be re-issued to the client during the cache lifetime. While the re-issued token is not treated as valid for API authorization, affected users may be unable to obtain a new valid access token until the cache is cleared, which can disrupt authentication flows. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6647 | 1 Wso2 | 3 Identity Server, Wso2 Carbon Oauth, Wso2 Identity Server | 2026-10-29 | 7.4 High |
| In deployments of WSO2 Identity Server configured with a case-insensitive user store and a case-sensitive database for identity data, mismatches in username case handling can occur. This inconsistency results in OAuth token revocation operations failing to correctly identify usernames containing mixed-case characters during certain lifecycle events, preventing tokens from being invalidated. A malicious actor can exploit this vulnerability by possessing a valid access or refresh token associated with a mixed-case username. In affected configurations, these tokens may not be revoked when expected. The actor can then leverage these unrevoked tokens, before their expiry, to continue performing actions that should have been restricted, effectively bypassing intended access controls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117574 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 2 Red Hat Openshift Ai (rhoai), Openshift Ai | 2026-10-29 | 9.1 Critical |
| A flaw was found in ai-gateway-payload-processing. An authenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by submitting a request specifying another tenant's model identifier in the request body or header. Because the service does not verify authorization before retrieving credentials from the shared store, it injects the target tenant's application programming interface (API) keys into the request. This flaw allows an attacker to perform unauthorized requests and consume another tenant's large language model (LLM) resources and quotas. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55561 | 1 Invoiceplane | 1 Invoiceplane | 2026-10-29 | N/A |
| InvoicePlane is a self-hosted open source application for managing invoices, clients, and payments. Prior to 1.7.2-beta-1, guest users can approve or reject quotes belonging to any client, not just their assigned clients. The `approve()` and `reject()` methods in the Guest Quotes controller, `application/modules/guest/controllers/Quotes.php`, call `approve_quote_by_id($quote_id)` and `reject_quote_by_id($quote_id)` directly without the `where_in('ip_quotes.client_id', $this->user_clients)` scoping that sibling methods use. A guest user assigned to one client can change another client's quote status by supplying sequential integer `quote_id` values, and `email_quote_status()` also sends notification emails. Additionally, `generate_pdf()` calls `mark_viewed($quote_id)` before checking the client scope, allowing a guest user to mark another client's quote as viewed. These issues are fixed in version 1.7.2-beta-1 and the subsequent stable version 1.7.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91296 | 1 Oracle | 1 Jd Edwards Enterpriseone Tools | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Enterprise Infrastructure SEC). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.5. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-91318 | 1 Oracle | 1 Jdeveloper | 2026-10-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle JDeveloper product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Security Framework). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle JDeveloper. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle JDeveloper accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-91328 | 1 Oracle | 1 Jd Edwards Enterpriseone Tools | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Deployment SEC). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.5. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with logon to the infrastructure where JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools executes to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-118658 | 1 Labstack | 1 Echo | 2026-10-28 | 4.7 Medium |
| Echo is a Go web framework. Prior to 4.15.2 and 5.1.1, Context.Scheme returns values from X-Forwarded-Proto, X-Forwarded-Protocol, or X-Url-Scheme without validating that they are supported web schemes. WWWRedirect and NonWWWRedirect use that value to construct a Location header, so an attacker controlling a forwarded scheme header can cause a redirect to use an arbitrary URI scheme. Exploitation requires an affected redirect middleware and user interaction with the response; the HTTPS-specific redirect variants hardcode HTTPS and are unaffected. This issue is fixed in 4.15.2 and 5.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115748 | 1 Apache | 1 Vysper | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| **UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED** Authorization bypass in Apache Vysper, all versions. Apache Vysper is an XMPP (Jabber) server library. Its XEP-0077 (In-Band Registration) implementation is missing an authentication check, allowing any authenticated user to compromise other accounts. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65219 | 1 Smci | 1 Mbd-x12spi | 2026-10-28 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw in the BMC RAKP+ implementation may allow an attacker to send a request followed by a specially crafted RAKP message and establish an RMCP+ session, which could then be used to execute commands. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111590 | 1 Goharbor | 1 Harbor | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| A wide range of Harbor versions allow SSRF via its webhook delivery component which does not properly validate web hook target addresses, allowing usage of private and link-local IP ranges. An authenticated attacker with ProjectAdmin permissions can configure a webhook policy pointing to a private internal address. When a project event fires, Harbor jobservice makes unauthenticated outbound HTTP POST requests to the target. If the target answers with an error status, the response body is written to the webhook execution log, which project members can read, potentially exposing cloud metadata or other network-restricted resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117499 | 1 Fastify | 1 Session | 2026-10-28 | 3.7 Low |
| @fastify/session is a session plugin for Fastify. In all releases before 11.1.6, with the default rolling session behavior, a request that restored a session before a logout could save its own copy after another request had completed the session destroy call, recreating the destroyed session identifier with its authenticated data. An attacker who already holds a victim's valid signed session cookie and keeps a request in flight across the logout can replay that cookie to restore the session after it was meant to be revoked, without any cookie theft or signature forgery. The issue is fixed in @fastify/session 11.1.6, which adds a per session generation marker and a conditional store write so a session restored before a logout or regeneration cannot recreate or overwrite the current entry, and users should upgrade to 11.1.6 or later. There is no workaround, and custom session stores must implement the new conditional write. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117562 | 1 Anyant | 1 Rssant | 2026-10-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| rssant 1.9.0 through 1.9.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to read stories from unpublished feeds through the anonymous publish.story_get endpoint. Because UnionStory.get_by_feed_offset ignores the only_publish flag, attackers can enumerate feed IDs and offsets to retrieve private feed stories. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103313 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Bitpay Gateway For Woocommerce | 2026-10-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| The BitPay Gateway for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 4.1.3 does not bind the payment provider's transaction confirmation to the order it completes, nor verify the confirmed amount, allowing an unauthenticated attacker who holds a single genuine low-value transaction to mark arbitrary higher-value orders as paid. | ||||