Export limit exceeded: 24032 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24032 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-116842 | 1 Diasurgical | 1 Devilutionx | 2026-10-28 | 6.1 Medium |
| DevilutionX 1.4.0 through 1.5.5 contains a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the bundled libmpq libmpq__archive_dup routine when opening crafted MPQ archives. Attackers can supply an MPQ archive whose block table count exceeds its hash table count, causing memcpy to overflow the heap during startup and crash the game. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16521 | 1 Smci | 1 Mbd-x12stw-f | 2026-10-28 | 7.2 High |
| An OS command injection vulnerability exists because of insufficient input filtering. An attacker can inject a command payload into a BMC function; the payload may execute when the related service is restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65213 | 1 Smci | 1 Mbd-x12spi | 2026-10-28 | 6.6 Medium |
| This issue may allow an IPMI authenticated administrator to execute commands as the operating system root user on the BMC | ||||
| CVE-2026-117558 | 1 Ai-sdlc-framework | 1 Ai-sdlc | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| The ai-sdlc plugin MCP server through 0.31.2 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute commands by supplying shell metacharacters in the repo argument. The unvalidated repo value is interpolated into gh issue view or gh pr view commands run via execSync(), letting prompt-injected agents execute commands as the MCP server user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117559 | 1 Hyperb1iss | 1 Droidmind | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| DroidMind through 0.4.0 contains a command injection vulnerability that allows MCP clients to bypass the shell command allowlist by using $(...) or backtick substitution. Attackers, including prompt-injected agents, can inject commands through parameters interpolated into Device.run_shell() or unvalidated Device.list_directory() to run blocked commands such as reboot on connected Android devices. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117560 | 1 Atxp | 1 Gemini-cli-extension | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| ATXP Gemini CLI extension through 1.0.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in runAtxp() that allows attackers to execute shell commands through unsanitized MCP tool parameters. Attackers can plant instructions in email or SMS content to inject $() or backtick substitutions into parameters like message_id, subject, or query, running commands as the user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117561 | 1 Codefriar | 1 Sf-mcp | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| Codefriar sf-mcp through 1.3.2 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute shell commands by supplying crafted Salesforce CLI tool flag values. Because escapeValue() in src/utils.ts fails to neutralize backticks, $() substitution, and other shell metacharacters, these values reach execSync in executeSfCommand and run as the MCP server user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117567 | 1 Horw | 1 Esp-mcp | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| esp-mcp through commit 28afddf contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to run arbitrary commands by supplying shell metacharacters in MCP tool parameters. Attackers influencing agent tool calls through prompt injection can inject metacharacters into target, port, project_path, or project_name values passed to asyncio.create_subprocess_shell, executing commands as the MCP server user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117568 | 1 Bitscorp-mcp | 1 Mcp-ffmpeg | 2026-10-28 | 7 High |
| mcp-ffmpeg through 1.0.5 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to run shell commands by supplying crafted videoPath or outputDir values to the resize-video, extract-audio and get-video-info tools. Attackers can embed $(), backticks or a closing double quote in an existing file or directory name to break out of the child_process.exec command string and execute commands as the MCP server user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117569 | 1 Alishahid74 | 1 Kali-gpt | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| Kali-GPT through commit a608c74 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in execute_tool() in kali_gpt/tools/mcp_server.py that allows MCP clients to run commands via unsanitized scanner parameters. Attackers or prompt-injected agents can embed shell metacharacters in parameters like target, ports, domain, wordlist, or url, executed via subprocess.run with shell=True as the MCP server user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117573 | 1 Masc-ucsc | 1 Hagent | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| hagent through commit 761eec6 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows MCP clients to execute shell commands by injecting metacharacters into the args parameter of the hagent_arduino and hagent_esp32 tools. Attackers or prompt-injected agents can supply crafted args interpolated into arduino-cli and idf.py commands run with subprocess.run(shell=True) to execute commands as the MCP server user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86395 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain Virtual Edition | 2026-10-28 | 7.2 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain Virtual Edition, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67074 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Aex | 2026-10-28 | 9.1 Critical |
| HCL BigFix AEX is affected by a Remote Code Execution Vulnerability . It may allow attackers to execute code with the privileges of the affected application or service, potentially leading to unauthorized access, data exposure, or system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111108 | 1 Apache | 1 Kafka | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Apache Kafka's code-generated protocol readers pre-size an array's collection from the element count declared by the sender. That count is checked only against the bytes remaining in the request buffer, which assumes about one byte per element; because most elements need several bytes, a request can declare far more elements than the buffer holds and still pass. For a keyed array the reader then allocates an ImplicitLinkedHashCollection of capacity (2 * count +1), so a request of a few tens of megabytes can force a heap allocation several times larger before any element is read. The pattern is emitted into every generated reader, so it affects all Kafka API types with an array field. Impact: Request parsing happens before any authorization check. On a listener that does not require authentication (for example PLAINTEXT), an unauthenticated attacker can send a few concurrent requests that each declare a very large= array length and allocate many times their wire size in broker heap, crashing the broker with an OutOfMemoryError. The reporter demonstrated three concurrent ~90 MB ProduceRequest (v3) connections exhausting a 1 GB heap (~8x amplification). On listeners that require authentication, the attacker needs valid credentials but no specific ACL, since parsing precedes authorization.. Mitigation: Upgrade to Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.2, or 4.4.0. Until then, lowering socket.request.max.bytes and restricting network access to broker listeners reduces, but does not remove, exposure. Resolution: From Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.2, and 4.4.0: generated readers cap the initial array pre-allocation at MessageUtil.MAX_PREALLOCATED_ARRAY_CAPACITY (1000) and grow it on demand, and reject a declared array length above MessageUtil.MAX_ARRAY_LENGTH (1,000,000). | ||||
| CVE-2026-111551 | 1 Apache | 1 Kafka | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Several Kafka deserialization paths read a size or count field from input data and use it directly to allocate an array, collection, or byte buffer, with no check against the bytes actually available. A small crafted input can therefore declare a very large size and force a multi-gigabyte allocation. The affected paths are, in Kafka Streams, ProcessorRecordContext (header count), ChangedDeserializer (varint value length), CombinedKeySchema (foreign-key length, which could also produce a negative size), ProcessorMetadata (key length), and AssignmentInfo group-assignment decoding; and, in the clients library, ListDeserializer (used by ListSerde). Impact: An attacker can trigger the oversized allocation and raise an OutOfMemoryError that crashes the affected consumer or Kafka Streams thread; the broker and the rest of the cluster are unaffected. The reachable surface depends on the path: writing a crafted record to a Streams application's internal changelog or repartition topics, or committing crafted offset metadata to its consumer group (Streams internal paths); writing a crafted record to any topic that a consumer reads with ListSerde (ListDeserializer); or, as a member of a Streams consumer group, returning crafted assignment data when elected leader (AssignmentInfo). Because a crafted record remains in its topic, the error can recur on restart. The record size limit (max.message.bytes) does not help, because the allocation is driven by a size field rather than by the input's length. Mitigation: Upgrade to Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.2, or 4.4.0. Where authorization is enabled, restrict write access to each application's internal topics and consumer group to its own principal, and restrict who can produce to topics that are consumed with ListSerde. Resolution: From Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.2, and 4.4.0: these deserialization paths validate the declared size against the remaining input before allocating and reject input that fails the check. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103391 | 1 Juniper | 1 Session Smart Router | 2026-10-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in the SSR TCP proxy/optimization path in Juniper Networks Session Smart Router allows an attacker to corrupt forwarded packet data and potentially cause a data-plane crash via a transit TCP packet with a crafted TCP option length. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103392 | 1 Juniper | 1 Session Smart Router | 2026-10-28 | 4.8 Medium |
| An Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability in the TCP header processing in Juniper Networks Session Smart Router allows an attacker to corrupt TCP payload data and potentially cause session desynchronization via a transit TCP packet with an oversized SACK option length. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103403 | 1 Juniper | 2 Session Smart Conductor, Session Smart Router | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in AccessManager in Juniper Networks Session Smart Router and Session Smart Conductor allows an attacker to perform arbitrary file deletion and arbitrary command execution via the deletion of an audit rule. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103406 | 1 Juniper | 1 Session Smart Conductor | 2026-10-28 | 9.8 Critical |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerability in the AutomatedProvisioner in Juniper Networks Session Smart Conductor allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root via a specially crafted salt minion ID. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106079 | 1 Juniper | 2 Session Smart Conductor, Session Smart Router | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in AccessManager in Juniper Networks Session Smart Router and Session Smart Conductor allows an attacker with config-write privileges to achieve arbitrary command execution as root in the YANG configuration. | ||||