Export limit exceeded: 16028 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 17118 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (17118 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-0018 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Internet Explorer | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Internet Explorer 10 and 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted web site, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0037 and CVE-2017-0149. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0019 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Word | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Word 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0006, CVE-2017-0020, CVE-2017-0030, CVE-2017-0031, CVE-2017-0052, and CVE-2017-0053. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0020 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Excel, Office Web Apps | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Excel 2016, Excel 2010 SP2, Excel 2013 RT SP1, and Office Web Apps Server 2013 SP1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0006, CVE-2017-0019, CVE-2017-0030, CVE-2017-0031, CVE-2017-0052, and CVE-2017-0053. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0032 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0034 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly accesses objects in memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in a way that enables an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0031 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Office, Office Compatibility Pack, Word | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Office 2010 SP2, Office Compatibility Pack SP3, Word 2007 SP3, and Word 2010 SP2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0006, CVE-2017-0019, CVE-2017-0020, CVE-2017-0030, CVE-2017-0052, and CVE-2017-0053. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0035 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0053 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Office, Office Compatibility Pack, Word and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Office 2010 SP2, Office Compatibility Pack SP3, Word 2007 SP3, Word 2010 SP2, Word 2013 SP1, Word 2013 R2 SP1, Word 2016, and Word Viewer allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0006, CVE-2017-0019, CVE-2017-0020, CVE-2017-0030, CVE-2017-0031, and CVE-2017-0052. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0067 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0071 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0072 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 7, Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Uniscribe in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, and Windows 7 SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site, aka "Uniscribe Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0083, CVE-2017-0084, CVE-2017-0086, CVE-2017-0087, CVE-2017-0088, CVE-2017-0089, and CVE-2017-0090. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000118 | 1 Akka | 1 Http Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Akka HTTP versions <= 10.0.5 Illegal Media Range in Accept Header Causes StackOverflowError Leading to Denial of Service | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000127 | 1 Exiv2 | 1 Exiv2 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Exiv2 0.26 contains a heap buffer overflow in tiff parser | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000174 | 1 Swftools | 1 Swftools | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In SWFTools, an address access exception was found in swfdump swf_GetBits(). | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000176 | 1 Swftools | 1 Swftools | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In SWFTools, a memcpy buffer overflow was found in swfc. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000185 | 1 Swftools | 1 Swftools | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In SWFTools, a memcpy buffer overflow was found in gif2swf. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000186 | 1 Swftools | 1 Swftools | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In SWFTools, a stack overflow was found in pdf2swf. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000187 | 1 Swftools | 1 Swftools | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In SWFTools, an address access exception was found in pdf2swf. FoFiTrueType::writeTTF() | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000198 | 2 Redhat, Tcmu-runner Project | 2 Storage, Tcmu-runner | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| tcmu-runner daemon version 0.9.0 to 1.2.0 is vulnerable to invalid memory references in the handler_glfs.so handler resulting in denial of service | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000206 | 1 Htslib | 1 Htslib | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| samtools htslib library version 1.4.0 and earlier is vulnerable to buffer overflow in the CRAM rANS codec resulting in potential arbitrary code execution | ||||