Export limit exceeded: 11784 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 15496 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (15496 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-15262 | 1 Irfanview | 2 Irfanview, Pdf | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IrfanView version 4.44 (32bit) with PDF plugin version 4.43 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a crafted .pdf file, related to "Data from Faulting Address controls Code Flow starting at PDF!xmlParserInputRead+0x0000000000048d0c." | ||||
| CVE-2017-15263 | 1 Irfanview | 2 Irfanview, Pdf | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IrfanView version 4.44 (32bit) with PDF plugin version 4.43 allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted .pdf file, related to "Data from Faulting Address controls Branch Selection starting at PDF!xmlListWalk+0x00000000000166c4." | ||||
| CVE-2017-15264 | 1 Irfanview | 1 Irfanview | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IrfanView version 4.44 (32bit) allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted .tif file, related to "Data from Faulting Address is used as one or more arguments in a subsequent Function Call starting at image00000000_00400000+0x00000000000236e4." | ||||
| CVE-2017-15275 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| Samba before 4.7.3 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging failure of the server to clear allocated heap memory. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15281 | 2 Canonical, Imagemagick | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Imagemagick | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| ReadPSDImage in coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 7.0.7-6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted file, related to "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)." | ||||
| CVE-2017-15311 | 1 Huawei | 8 Mate 10, Mate 10 Firmware, Mate 10 Pro and 5 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The baseband modules of Mate 10, Mate 10 Pro, Mate 9, Mate 9 Pro Huawei smart phones with software before ALP-AL00 8.0.0.120(SP2C00), before BLA-AL00 8.0.0.120(SP2C00), before MHA-AL00B 8.0.0.334(C00), and before LON-AL00B 8.0.0.334(C00) have a stack overflow vulnerability due to the lack of parameter validation. An attacker could send malicious packets to the smart phones within radio range by special wireless device, which leads stack overflow when the baseband module handles these packets. The attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform a denial of service attack or remote code execution in baseband module. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15370 | 2 Debian, Sound Exchange Project | 2 Debian Linux, Sound Exchange | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| There is a heap-based buffer overflow in the ImaExpandS function of ima_rw.c in Sound eXchange (SoX) 14.4.2. A Crafted input will lead to a denial of service attack during conversion of an audio file. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15372 | 2 Debian, Sound Exchange Project | 2 Debian Linux, Sound Exchange | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| There is a stack-based buffer overflow in the lsx_ms_adpcm_block_expand_i function of adpcm.c in Sound eXchange (SoX) 14.4.2. A Crafted input will lead to a denial of service attack during conversion of an audio file. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15385 | 1 Radare | 1 Radare2 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The store_versioninfo_gnu_verdef function in libr/bin/format/elf/elf.c in radare2 2.0.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (r_read_le16 invalid write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted ELF file. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16352 | 2 Debian, Graphicsmagick | 2 Debian Linux, Graphicsmagick | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| GraphicsMagick 1.3.26 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability found in the "Display visual image directory" feature of the DescribeImage() function of the magick/describe.c file. One possible way to trigger the vulnerability is to run the identify command on a specially crafted MIFF format file with the verbose flag. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16357 | 1 Radare | 1 Radare2 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In radare 2.0.1, a memory corruption vulnerability exists in store_versioninfo_gnu_verdef() and store_versioninfo_gnu_verneed() in libr/bin/format/elf/elf.c, as demonstrated by an invalid free. This error is due to improper sh_size validation when allocating memory. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16364 | 1 Adobe | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. This issue is due to an untrusted pointer dereference when handling number format dictionary entries. In this scenario, the input is crafted in way that the computation results in pointers to memory locations that do not belong to the relevant process address space. The dereferencing operation is a read operation, and an attack can result in sensitive data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16371 | 1 Adobe | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. This issue is due to an untrusted pointer dereference in the JavaScript engine. In this scenario, the input is crafted in a way that the computation results in pointers to memory locations that do not belong to the relevant process address space. The dereferencing operation is a read operation, and an attack can result in sensitive data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16372 | 1 Adobe | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. This issue is due to untrusted pointer dereference in the JavaScript API engine. In this scenario, the JavaScript input is crafted in way that the computation results with pointer to memory locations that do not belong to the relevant process address space. The dereferencing operation is a read operation, and an attack can result with sensitive data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16373 | 1 Adobe | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. This issue is due to an untrusted pointer dereference. In this scenario, the input is crafted in way that the computation results in pointers to memory locations that do not belong to the relevant process address space. The dereferencing operation is a read operation, and an attack can result in sensitive data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16375 | 1 Adobe | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. This issue is due to an untrusted pointer dereference in the JavaSscript API engine. In this scenario, the JavaScript input is crafted in way that the computation results in pointers to memory locations that do not belong to the relevant process address space. The dereferencing operation is a read operation, and an attack can result in sensitive data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16381 | 1 Adobe | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. The vulnerability is caused by a buffer access with an incorrect length value when processing TIFF files embedded within an XPS document. Crafted TIFF image input causes a mismatch between allocated buffer size and the access allowed by the computation. If an attacker can adequately control the accessible memory then this vulnerability can be leveraged to achieve arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16383 | 1 Adobe | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. This vulnerability is an instance of a heap overflow vulnerability when processing a JPEG file embedded within an XPS document. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16385 | 1 Adobe | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. The vulnerability is caused by a buffer access with an incorrect length value in TIFF parsing during XPS conversion. Crafted TIFF image input causes a mismatch between allocated buffer size and the access allowed by the computation. If an attacker can adequately control the accessible memory then this vulnerability can be leveraged to achieve arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16386 | 1 Adobe | 4 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Acrobat and Reader: 2017.012.20098 and earlier versions, 2017.011.30066 and earlier versions, 2015.006.30355 and earlier versions, and 11.0.22 and earlier versions. This vulnerability occurs as a result of a computation that reads data that is past the end of the target buffer; the computation is part of the XPS2PDF conversion engine. The use of an invalid (out-of-range) pointer offset during access of internal data structure fields causes the vulnerability. A successful attack can lead to sensitive data exposure. | ||||