Export limit exceeded: 417585 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 417585 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 417585 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (417585 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-70125 | 1 Microsoft | 3 365 Apps, Office 2021, Office 2024 | 2026-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62804 | 1 Microsoft | 14 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft 365 Apps For Enterprise and 11 more | 2026-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| External control of file name or path in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85893 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55613 | 2026-10-30 | N/A | ||
| uhttpd is a small HTTP server. In unpatched repository snapshots, `uh_ubus_data_send()` in `ubus.c` can desynchronize HTTP request boundaries when a `POST /ubus` JSON body arrives in multiple TCP segments. An initial segment completing a JSON object sets `du->jsobj`; a later segment takes the existing-object parse-error path and returns zero bytes consumed. The caller neither drains the remaining declared `Content-Length` nor sets `connection_close`. An HTTP request embedded in the unread body suffix is consequently processed as a new request on the same keep-alive connection. The reported reproducer returned a JSON-RPC parse error followed by a second HTTP response. This application-layer body-handler flaw is distinct from Transfer-Encoding header case handling and chunk-length state reset, and affects deployments enabling ubus, including the default OpenWrt configuration and potential proxy/CDN deployments. Repository patches 7b1bec45826bd78c8afc993435bdc0f1df2fe399 and b2285de129b9adc8b12f84f9a27c16c21f2b57a5 address this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81396 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Excel, Excel 2016 and 8 more | 2026-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73013 | 1 Microsoft | 22 Office, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 19 more | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Imaging Component allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69499 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Office, Office 365, Office Macos 2021 and 20 more | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Imaging Component allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64918 | 1 Microsoft | 5 365 Apps, Office 2016, Office 2019 and 2 more | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| Insufficiently protected credentials in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69610 | 1 Microsoft | 22 Office 365, Office Macos 2021, Office Macos 2024 and 19 more | 2026-10-30 | 7 High |
| Buffer over-read in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68880 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Office, Office 365, Office Macos 2021 and 20 more | 2026-10-30 | 8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77491 | 1 Microsoft | 30 Office, Office 365, Office Macos 2021 and 27 more | 2026-10-30 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows GDI allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69576 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Office, Office 365, Office Macos 2021 and 20 more | 2026-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Use after free in Graphic Fonts allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69609 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Office, Office 365, Office Macos 2021 and 20 more | 2026-10-30 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63184 | 2026-10-30 | 7.1 High | ||
| Refitter is a tool for generating a C# REST API client using the Refit library. Prior to 2.1.1, the `refitter` dotnet tool invokes `NJsonSchema` with unsafe defaults for `$ref` resolution when generating Refit interfaces and contracts from attacker-controlled or attacker-influenced OpenAPI descriptions. Remote `http(s)` references cause requests from the developer or CI host and inline untrusted remote schema content into generated output. Absolute local file paths and relative `../` traversal outside the input directory also resolve and inline local content, permitting arbitrary local-file disclosure. The demonstrated chain stops at server-side request forgery, remote file inclusion, and local file inclusion, not code execution: Refit sets the base URL at runtime, enum values use verbatim-string doubling, and string defaults are escaped. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63182 | 2026-10-30 | 8.1 High | ||
| LightSAML implements SAML 2.0 data model classes, XML serialization and deserialization, XML security, certificate support, and message bindings. Prior to 4.7.1 and 5.0.1, LightSAML and xmlseclibs disagree about which assertion an inbound SAML signature covers. `Response::deserialize` uses `manyElementsFromXml` to collect only direct-child `saml:Assertion` elements of `samlp:Response`, and `AssertionSignatureValidatorAction` validates their `ds:Signature` using an out-of-band trusted IdP credential resolved by Issuer, not a key from the document. `XMLSecurityDSig::validateReference()` removes the enveloped signature from the shared DOM, but `processRefNode()` resolves `Reference URI="#id"` document-wide through an XPath of the form `//*[@Id]` and takes `item(0)`, which need not be the assertion whose claims LightSAML consumes. An attacker who has captured one genuinely signed assertion, such as an earlier login response, can place its signature-stripped bytes earlier in `samlp:Extensions` and present a forged direct-child assertion with the same ID and copied genuine signature. Validation then covers the hidden genuine bytes while LightSAML surfaces unsigned attacker-controlled `Subject/NameID`, `Conditions`, and `Attributes`, enabling authentication bypass or privilege escalation even when signature validation is required. The behavior was confirmed in versions 5.0.0 and 4.6.1. This issue is fixed in versions 4.7.1 and 5.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119333 | 1 Jgraph | 1 Drawio-desktop | 2026-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| draw.io Desktop is the official Electron build of draw.io. Prior to 31.5.2, the Windows application launched powershell and attrib by bare executable name from src/main/electron.js. When draw.io Desktop was not already running, opening a diagram from File Explorer made the diagram directory the current working directory, allowing a colocated attacker-controlled powershell.bat or attrib.exe to be resolved before the intended system executable. A victim who extracted an attacker-supplied archive and cold-opened its legitimate .drawio file could therefore execute attacker-controlled code when Local Fonts were enabled or when draft or backup attributes were updated. This issue is fixed in version 31.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119334 | 1 Pi-hole | 1 Pi-hole | 2026-10-30 | 2.2 Low |
| Pi-hole is a DNS sinkhole that protects devices from unwanted content without installing any client-side software. Prior to 6.5, gravity.sh checks file:// adlist readability with sudo -u pihole test -r but then allows curl, sometimes running as root, to normalize URL dot segments and open a different file. A pihole-readable decoy can therefore pass the check while curl reads a root-only target, and /proc/self paths can similarly resolve against different processes. Exploitation requires an administrator who can add adlists and can place a symlink and decoy on the filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 6.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115828 | 1 Delinea | 1 Secret Server | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| In Secret Server versions earlier than 12.3.1, Secret Server did not always validate the PIN or biometric check when using a FIDO2-compliant device | ||||
| CVE-2026-115830 | 1 Delinea | 1 Secret Server | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| In Secret Server versions earlier than 12.3.1, a user under certain conditions could submit an unsigned JWT and receive cloudadmin permissions in response. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115829 | 1 Delinea | 1 Secret Server | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| In Secret Server versions earlier than 12.3.1, a user could bypass the initial login step and authenticate by successfully negotiating the second factor login step only. | ||||