Export limit exceeded: 421049 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 421049 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (421049 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-87045 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| The HTTP/2 server in subsys/net/lib/http/http_server_http2.c clears the connection's stream binding at the start of every frame. handle_http_frame_header() executed client->current_stream = NULL unconditionally, but a CONTINUATION frame does not open a new stream and enter_http_frame_continuation_state() never re-bound one, so the rest of the header block was processed with client->current_stream unset. Two paths then write through the NULL pointer. A request for an unregistered resource, or a method the matched resource does not support, is answered by send_http2_404() or send_http2_405(), and both call send_headers_frame(), which unconditionally sets client->current_stream->headers_sent = true. A POST, PUT or PATCH to a registered dynamic resource reaches handle_http2_dynamic_resource(), which unlike its siblings (handle_http2_static_resource(), dynamic_get_del_opts_req_v2(), dynamic_post_put_req_v2()) had no client->current_stream == NULL guard, and stores through the pointer with client->current_stream->current_detail = dynamic_detail. Any peer that can reach the server can trigger this without authentication or prior state. A single stray CONTINUATION frame with END_HEADERS set, sent right after the client preface and requesting any unregistered path, is enough, because nothing rejected a CONTINUATION that no HEADERS frame had opened. A legitimate split header block (a HEADERS frame with END_HEADERS clear whose payload ends on a header-field boundary, then a CONTINUATION with END_HEADERS set) reaches the same state. The in-tree test test_http2_post_headers_with_continuation() did not catch this because it splits the header block mid field, which takes the handle_incomplete_http_header() shortcut that keeps the stream bound. The result is a write to a fixed low address (a small offset into struct http2_stream_ctx), which faults on mainstream targets (flash/vector-table region on Cortex-M, or a trap under MPU/MMU null-pointer detection), and the default fatal-error handler halts the system. Impact is an unauthenticated, remotely triggerable denial of service against any device running the HTTP/2 server: the 404 path needs no particular resource to be registered, and HTTP/2 is built into CONFIG_HTTP_SERVER with cleartext h2c accepted, so TLS does not prevent it. Neither the target address nor the written value is attacker-controlled, so there is no confidentiality or integrity impact. Applications built without CONFIG_HTTP_SERVER are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121186 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Iphone Os, Chrome | 2026-11-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| UI misrepresentation in Passwords in Google Chrome on on iOS prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-86877 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-11-06 | 6.2 Medium |
| A path traversal issue was addressed with improved path validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27. A malicious app may be able to delete files for which it does not have privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71407 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy | 2026-11-06 | 5.1 Medium |
| A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6 may allow an unauthenticated attacker who can bypass stack protection and ASLR to execute arbitrary code or commands in the context of the WAD daemon via crafted sockets, only if the explicit proxy is configured with Kerberos authentication and SOCKS enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39813 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortisandbox, Fortisandboxcloud | 2026-11-06 | 9.1 Critical |
| A path traversal: '../filedir' vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8 may allow attacker to escalation of privilege via specially crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30897 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-11-06 | 5.9 Medium |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0 all versions may allow a remote authenticated attacker who can bypass stack protection and ASLR to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25689 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortideceptor | 2026-11-06 | 6 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('argument injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiDeceptor 6.2.0, FortiDeceptor 6.0 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.3 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.2 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.0 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.3 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.2 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.0 all versions may allow a privileged attacker with super-admin profile and CLI access to delete sensitive files via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24641 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-11-06 | 2.5 Low |
| A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability [CWE-476] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4 all versions, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to crash the HTTP daemon via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24640 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-11-06 | 5.9 Medium |
| A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4 all versions, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0.2 through 7.0.12 may allow a remote authenticated attacker who can bypass stack protection and ASLR to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23708 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortisoar, Fortisoar On-premise, Fortisoaron-premise and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 6.7 Medium |
| A improper authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.2 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication via replaying captured 2FA request. The attack requires being able to intercept and decrypt authentication traffic and precise timing to replay the request before token expiration, which raises the attack complexity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22576 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortisoar, Fortisoar On-premise, Fortisoaron-premise and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 4.1 Medium |
| A storing passwords in a recoverable format vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker to retrieve passwords for multiple installed connectors via server address modification in connector configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22154 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortisoar, Fortisoar On-premise, Fortisoaron-premise and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 4.4 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform a stored cross site scripting (XSS) attack via crafted HTTP Requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106170 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisandbox | 2026-11-06 | 4.8 Medium |
| An Uncaught Exception vulnerability [CWE-248] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.2.0 through 5.2.1, FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, FortiSandbox 4.4 all versions may allow a privileged attacker to deny access to the GUI and CLI persistently via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66987 | 2026-11-06 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where the account lockout mechanism did not sufficiently restrict repeated failed login attempts, allowing an attacker to make a large number of password guesses against a user account. This may increase the risk of account compromise through brute-force attacks, potentially resulting in unintended behavior or security impact under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66982 | 2026-11-06 | 3.3 Low | ||
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where browser autocomplete was enabled on sensitive login form fields, allowing the browser to store and suggest previously entered values. A malicious user with access to the same browser or system could retrieve saved credentials, potentially resulting in unintended behavior or security impact under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66984 | 2026-11-06 | 3.1 Low | ||
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where certain application responses revealed internal server file system paths. This information could help an attacker understand the application structure and plan further attacks, potentially resulting in unintended behavior or security impact under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-123676 | 2 201206030, Xxyopen | 2 Novel, Novel | 2026-11-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in xxyopen/201206030 novel up to 3.5.0. This impacts the function BookServiceImpl.getBookContentAbout of the file src/main/java/io/github/xxyopen/novel/service/impl/BookServiceImpl.java of the component Book Content Service. Such manipulation of the argument chapterId leads to improper authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The name of the patch is 966c4bdde3521dc0a165d15a2acff66ee33eaaa7. Applying a patch is advised to resolve this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118548 | 1 Drupal | 1 Artificial Intelligence | 2026-11-06 | 3.7 Low |
| Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) allows Resource Injection. This issue affects AI (Artificial Intelligence) versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.4.11, from 1.5.0 to 1.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118546 | 1 Drupal | 1 Artificial Intelligence | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects AI (Artificial Intelligence) versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.4.11, from 1.5.0 to 1.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118545 | 1 Drupal | 1 Artificial Intelligence | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects AI (Artificial Intelligence) versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.4.11, from 1.5.0 to 1.5.2. | ||||