Export limit exceeded: 417873 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2530 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-1637 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1 and 6 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Schannel (aka Secure Channel) in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 does not properly restrict TLS state transitions, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks to EXPORT_RSA ciphers via crafted TLS traffic, related to the "FREAK" issue, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0204 and CVE-2015-1067. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1672 | 1 Microsoft | 1 .net Framework | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, 4.5, 4.5.1, and 4.5.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (recursion and performance degradation) via crafted encrypted data in an XML document, aka ".NET XML Decryption Denial of Service Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2015-2323 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| FortiOS 5.0.x before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.4 supports anonymous, export, RC4, and possibly other weak ciphers when using TLS to connect to FortiGuard servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS content by modifying packets. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2434 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Xml Core Services | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Microsoft XML Core Services 3.0 and 5.0 supports SSL 2.0, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by sniffing the network and conducting a decryption attack, aka "MSXML Information Disclosure Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-2471. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2471 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Xml Core Services | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Microsoft XML Core Services 3.0, 5.0, and 6.0 supports SSL 2.0, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by sniffing the network and conducting a decryption attack, aka "MSXML Information Disclosure Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-2434. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2476 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The WebDAV client in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 supports SSL 2.0, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by sniffing the network and conducting a decryption attack, aka "WebDAV Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2015-3197 | 3 Openssl, Oracle, Redhat | 13 Openssl, Exalogic Infrastructure, Oss Support Tools and 10 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| ssl/s2_srvr.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1r and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not prevent use of disabled ciphers, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by performing computations on SSLv2 traffic, related to the get_client_master_key and get_client_hello functions. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4458 | 1 Cisco | 1 Adaptive Security Appliance Software | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The TLS implementation in the Cavium cryptographic-module firmware, as distributed with Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.1(5.21) and other products, does not verify the MAC field, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS content by modifying packets, aka Bug ID CSCuu52976. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4550 | 1 Cisco | 1 Adaptive Security Appliance Software | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Cavium cryptographic-module firmware on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) devices with software 9.3(3) and 9.4(1.1) does not verify the AES-GCM Integrity Check Value (ICV) octets, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof IPSec and IKEv2 traffic by modifying packet data, aka Bug ID CSCuu66218. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5012 | 1 Ibm | 3 Security Access Manager 9.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Web 7.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Web 8.0 Firmware | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The SSH implementation on IBM Security Access Manager for Web appliances 7.0 before 7.0.0 FP19, 8.0 before 8.0.1.3 IF3, and 9.0 before 9.0.0.0 IF1 does not properly restrict the set of MAC algorithms, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5655 | 1 Adways | 1 Party Track Sdk | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Adways Party Track SDK before 1.6.6 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5717 | 1 Siemens | 1 Compas | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Siemens COMPAS Mobile application before 1.6 for Android does not properly verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5824 | 1 Apple | 3 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Watchos | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The NSURL implementation in the CFNetwork SSL component in Apple iOS before 9 does not properly verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers after a certificate change, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5907 | 1 Apple | 1 Iphone Os | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| WebKit in Apple iOS before 9 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct redirection attacks by leveraging the mishandling of the resource cache of an SSL web site with an invalid X.509 certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-6932 | 1 Vmware | 1 Vcenter Server | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| VMware vCenter Server 5.5 before u3 and 6.0 before u1 does not verify X.509 certificates from TLS LDAP servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8803 | 4 Canonical, Nettle Project, Opensuse and 1 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Nettle, Leap and 2 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The ecc_256_modp function in ecc-256.c in Nettle before 3.2 does not properly handle carry propagation and produces incorrect output in its implementation of the P-256 NIST elliptic curve, which allows attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8805. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8804 | 4 Canonical, Nettle Project, Opensuse and 1 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Nettle, Leap and 2 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| x86_64/ecc-384-modp.asm in Nettle before 3.2 does not properly handle carry propagation and produces incorrect output in its implementation of the P-384 NIST elliptic curve, which allows attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8805 | 4 Canonical, Nettle Project, Opensuse and 1 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Nettle, Leap and 2 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The ecc_256_modq function in ecc-256.c in Nettle before 3.2 does not properly handle carry propagation and produces incorrect output in its implementation of the P-256 NIST elliptic curve, which allows attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8803. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8867 | 3 Canonical, Php, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Php, Rhel Software Collections | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The openssl_random_pseudo_bytes function in ext/openssl/openssl.c in PHP before 5.4.44, 5.5.x before 5.5.28, and 5.6.x before 5.6.12 incorrectly relies on the deprecated RAND_pseudo_bytes function, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0800 | 3 Openssl, Pulsesecure, Redhat | 11 Openssl, Client, Steel Belted Radius and 8 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The SSLv2 protocol, as used in OpenSSL before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g and other products, requires a server to send a ServerVerify message before establishing that a client possesses certain plaintext RSA data, which makes it easier for remote attackers to decrypt TLS ciphertext data by leveraging a Bleichenbacher RSA padding oracle, aka a "DROWN" attack. | ||||