Export limit exceeded: 422029 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (89 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2011-3573 | 1 Oracle | 1 Communications Unified | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Communications Unified 7.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Calendar Server. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22118 | 4 Netapp, Oracle, Redhat and 1 more | 34 Hci, Management Services For Element Software, Commerce Guided Search and 31 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.15 and versions 5.3.x prior to 5.3.7, a WebFlux application is vulnerable to a privilege escalation: by (re)creating the temporary storage directory, a locally authenticated malicious user can read or modify files that have been uploaded to the WebFlux application, or overwrite arbitrary files with multipart request data. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22112 | 3 Oracle, Pivotal Software, Vmware | 8 Communications Element Manager, Communications Interactive Session Recorder, Communications Unified Inventory Management and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Spring Security 5.4.x prior to 5.4.4, 5.3.x prior to 5.3.8.RELEASE, 5.2.x prior to 5.2.9.RELEASE, and older unsupported versions can fail to save the SecurityContext if it is changed more than once in a single request.A malicious user cannot cause the bug to happen (it must be programmed in). However, if the application's intent is to only allow the user to run with elevated privileges in a small portion of the application, the bug can be leveraged to extend those privileges to the rest of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3738 | 3 Dell, Mcafee, Oracle | 16 Bsafe Cert-j, Bsafe Crypto-j, Bsafe Ssl-j and 13 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to a Missing Required Cryptographic Step vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1559 | 13 Canonical, Debian, F5 and 10 more | 91 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager and 88 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q). | ||||
| CVE-2019-17091 | 2 Eclipse, Oracle | 23 Mojarra, Application Testing Suite, Banking Enterprise Product Manufacturing and 20 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| faces/context/PartialViewContextImpl.java in Eclipse Mojarra, as used in Mojarra for Eclipse EE4J before 2.3.10 and Mojarra JavaServer Faces before 2.2.20, allows Reflected XSS because a client window field is mishandled. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11358 | 11 Backdropcms, Debian, Drupal and 8 more | 114 Backdrop, Debian Linux, Drupal and 111 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. | ||||
| CVE-2018-2571 | 1 Oracle | 1 Communications Unified Inventory Management | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Communications Unified Inventory Management component of Oracle Communications Applications (subcomponent: Portal). Supported versions that are affected are 7.2.4.2.x and 7.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Communications Unified Inventory Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Communications Unified Inventory Management accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Communications Unified Inventory Management accessible data. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2018-2570 | 1 Oracle | 1 Communications Unified Inventory Management | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Communications Unified Inventory Management component of Oracle Communications Applications (subcomponent: Portal). Supported versions that are affected are 7.2.4.2.x and 7.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Communications Unified Inventory Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Communications Unified Inventory Management accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Communications Unified Inventory Management accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Communications Unified Inventory Management. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 6.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L). | ||||