Export limit exceeded: 421176 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (8072 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-1514 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Google Chrome 1.0.154.53 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a throw statement with a long exception value. | ||||
| CVE-2009-1598 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Google Chrome executes DOM calls in response to a javascript: URI in the target attribute of a submit element within a form contained in an inline PDF file, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended Adobe Acrobat JavaScript restrictions on accessing the document object, as demonstrated by a web site that permits PDF uploads by untrusted users, and therefore has a shared document.domain between the web site and this javascript: URI. NOTE: the researcher reports that Adobe's position is "a PDF file is active content." | ||||
| CVE-2009-1690 | 3 Apple, Google, Redhat | 4 Iphone Os, Safari, Chrome and 1 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Use-after-free vulnerability in WebKit, as used in Apple Safari before 4.0, iPhone OS 1.0 through 2.2.1, iPhone OS for iPod touch 1.1 through 2.2.1, Google Chrome 1.0.154.53, and possibly other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) by setting an unspecified property of an HTML tag that causes child elements to be freed and later accessed when an HTML error occurs, related to "recursion in certain DOM event handlers." | ||||
| CVE-2009-2060 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| src/net/http/http_transaction_winhttp.cc in Google Chrome before 1.0.154.53 uses the HTTP Host header to determine the context of a document provided in a (1) 4xx or (2) 5xx CONNECT response from a proxy server, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary web script by modifying this CONNECT response, aka an "SSL tampering" attack. | ||||
| CVE-2009-2071 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Google Chrome before 1.0.154.53 displays a cached certificate for a (1) 4xx or (2) 5xx CONNECT response page returned by a proxy server, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof an arbitrary https site by letting a browser obtain a valid certificate from this site during one request, and then sending the browser a crafted 502 response page upon a subsequent request. | ||||
| CVE-2009-2121 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the browser kernel in Google Chrome before 2.0.172.33 allows remote HTTP servers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted response. | ||||
| CVE-2008-6996 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Google Chrome BETA (0.2.149.27) does not prompt the user before saving an executable file, which makes it easier for remote attackers or malware to cause a denial of service (disk consumption) or exploit other vulnerabilities via a URL that references an executable file, possibly related to the "ask where to save each file before downloading" setting. | ||||
| CVE-2009-2416 | 11 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 8 more | 19 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server and 16 more | 2026-04-23 | 6.5 Medium |
| Multiple use-after-free vulnerabilities in libxml2 2.5.10, 2.6.16, 2.6.26, 2.6.27, and 2.6.32, and libxml 1.8.17, allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted (1) Notation or (2) Enumeration attribute types in an XML file, as demonstrated by the Codenomicon XML fuzzing framework. | ||||
| CVE-2009-2555 | 1 Google | 2 Chrome, V8 | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in src/jsregexp.cc in Google V8 before 1.1.10.14, as used in Google Chrome before 2.0.172.37, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code in the Chrome sandbox via a crafted JavaScript regular expression. | ||||
| CVE-2009-2556 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Google Chrome before 2.0.172.37 allows attackers to leverage renderer access to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors that trigger excessive memory allocation. | ||||
| CVE-2009-2578 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Google Chrome 2.x through 2.0.172 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a long Unicode string argument to the write method, a related issue to CVE-2009-2479. | ||||
| CVE-2008-4724 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Google Chrome 0.2.149.30 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an ftp:// URL for an HTML document within a (1) JPG, (2) PDF, or (3) TXT file. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. | ||||
| CVE-2009-2352 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Google Chrome 1.0.154.48 and earlier does not block javascript: URIs in Refresh headers in HTTP responses, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via vectors related to (1) injecting a Refresh header or (2) specifying the content of a Refresh header, a related issue to CVE-2009-1312. NOTE: it was later reported that 2.0.172.28, 2.0.172.37, and 3.0.193.2 Beta are also affected. | ||||
| CVE-2008-6997 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Google Chrome 0.2.149.27 allows user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service (browser crash) via an IMG tag with a long src attribute, which triggers the crash when the victim performs an "Inspect Element" action. | ||||
| CVE-2008-6998 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in chrome/common/gfx/url_elider.cc in Google Chrome 0.2.149.27 and other versions before 0.2.149.29 might allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a link target (href attribute) with a large number of path elements, which triggers the overflow when the status bar is updated after the user hovers over the link. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7061 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| The tooltip manager (chrome/views/tooltip_manager.cc) in Google Chrome 0.2.149.29 Build 1798 and possibly other versions before 0.2.149.30 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption or crash) via a tag with a long title attribute, which is not properly handled when displaying a tooltip, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-6994. NOTE: there is inconsistent information about the environments under which this issue exists. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7246 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Google Chrome 0.2.149.29 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (unusable browser) by calling the window.print function in a loop, aka a "printing DoS attack," possibly a related issue to CVE-2009-0821. | ||||
| CVE-2008-4340 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Google Chrome 0.2.149.29 and 0.2.149.30 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an HTML document containing a carriage return ("\r\n\r\n") argument to the window.open function. | ||||
| CVE-2009-0276 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-domain vulnerability in the V8 JavaScript engine in Google Chrome before 1.0.154.46 allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy via a crafted script that accesses another frame and reads its full URL and possibly other sensitive information, or modifies the URL of this frame. | ||||
| CVE-2009-0374 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Google Chrome 1.0.154.43 allows remote attackers to trick a user into visiting an arbitrary URL via an onclick action that moves a crafted element to the current mouse position, related to a "Clickjacking" vulnerability. NOTE: a third party disputes the relevance of this issue, stating that "every sufficiently featured browser is and likely will remain susceptible to the behavior known as clickjacking," and adding that the exploit code "is not a valid demonstration of the issue. | ||||