| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) was discovered in the Akana API Platform in versions prior to and including 2022.1.3. Reported by Jakob Antonsson. |
| SAP CMC Promotion Management allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate internal network systems by submitting crafted requests during job source configuration. By analysing response times for various IP addresses and ports, the attacker can infer valid network endpoints. Successful exploitation may lead to information disclosure. This vulnerability does not impact the integrity or availability of the application. |
| SAP BI Platform allows an attacker to modify the IP address of the LogonToken for the OpenDoc. On accessing the modified link in the browser a different server could get the ping request. This has low impact on integrity with no impact on confidentiality and availability of the system. |
| NEC Platforms DT900 and DT900S Series 5.0.0.0 – v5.3.4.4, v5.4.0.0 – v5.6.0.20 allows an attacker to access a non-documented the system settings to change settings via local network with unauthenticated user.
|
| TwoNav 2.1.13 contains an SSRF vulnerability via the url paramater to index.php?c=api&method=read_data&type=connectivity_test (which reaches /system/api.php). |
| Users with low privileges can perform certain AJAX actions. In this vulnerability instance, improper access to ajax?action=plugin:focus:checkIframeAvailability leads to a Server-Side Request Forgery by analyzing the error messages returned from the back-end. Allowing an attacker to perform a port scan in the back-end. At the time of publication of the CVE no patch is available.
|
| Apache XML Security for C++ through 2.0.4 implements the XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) specification without protection against an SSRF payload in a KeyInfo element. NOTE: the project disputes this CVE Record on the grounds that any vulnerabilities are the result of a failure to configure XML Security for C++ securely. Even when avoiding this particular issue, any use of this library would need considerable additional code and a deep understanding of the standards and protocols involved to arrive at a secure implementation for any particular use case. We recommend against continued direct use of this library. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in multiple Netcore and Netis routers models with firmware released prior to August 2014 due to the presence of an undocumented backdoor listener on UDP port 53413. Exact version boundaries remain undocumented. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted UDP packets to execute arbitrary commands on the affected device. This backdoor uses a hardcoded authentication mechanism and accepts shell commands post-authentication. Some device models include a non-standard implementation of the `echo` command, which may affect exploitability. |
| A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in multiple firmware versions of AVTECH DVR devices that exposes the /cgi-bin/nobody/Search.cgi?action=cgi_query endpoint without authentication. An attacker can manipulate the ip, port, and queryb64str parameters to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the DVR to internal or external systems, potentially exposing sensitive data or interacting with internal services. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR camera models, including iZero, Targa 512, Targa 504, Targa Semplice, Targa 704 TKM, Targa 805, Targa 710 INOX, Targa 750, and Targa 704 ILB. The application fails to validate user-supplied input in JSON POST parameters such as ipnotify_address and url, which are used by internal mechanisms to perform image fetch and DNS lookups. This allows remote unauthenticated attackers to induce the system to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external systems, potentially bypassing firewall policies or conducting internal service enumeration. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-01-25 UTC. |
| NVIDIA NeMo Agent Toolkit UI for Web contains a vulnerability in the chat API endpoint where an attacker may cause a Server-Side Request Forgery. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to information disclosure and denial of service. |
| The W3C XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) specification, starting with 1.0, was originally published with a "RetrievalMethod is a URI ... that may be used to obtain key and/or certificate information" statement and no accompanying information about SSRF risks, and this may have contributed to vulnerable implementations such as those discussed in CVE-2023-36661 and CVE-2024-21893. NOTE: this was mitigated in 1.1 and 2.0 via a directly referenced Best Practices document that calls on implementers to be wary of SSRF. |
| NextChat is a cross-platform ChatGPT/Gemini UI. There is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability due to a lack of validation of the `endpoint` GET parameter on the WebDav API endpoint. This SSRF can be used to perform arbitrary HTTPS request from the vulnerable instance (MKCOL, PUT and GET methods supported), or to target NextChat users and make them execute arbitrary JavaScript code in their browser. This vulnerability has been patched in version 2.12.4.
|
| An issue in Doccano Open source annotation tools for machine learning practitioners v.1.8.4 and Doccano Auto Labeling Pipeline module to annotate a document automatically v.0.1.23 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the model_attribs parameter. |
| Gomatrixserverlib is a Go library for matrix federation. Gomatrixserverlib is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, serving content from a private network it can access, under certain conditions. The commit `c4f1e01` fixes this issue. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should use a local firewall to limit the network segments and hosts the service using gomatrixserverlib can access. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Remote Browser Plugin in Sonatype Nexus Repository 2.x up to and including 2.15.2 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to exfiltrate proxy repository credentials via crafted HTTP requests. |
| SummaryUsers with webhook permissions can conduct SSRF via webhooks. If they have permission to view the webhook logs, the (partial) request response is also disclosed
DetailsWhen sending webhooks, the destination is not validated, causing SSRF.
ImpactBypass of firewalls to interact with internal services.
See https://owasp.org/Top10/A10_2021-Server-Side_Request_Forgery_%28SSRF%29/ for more potential impact.
Resources https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Server_Side_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html for more information on SSRF and its fix. |
| The WP Crontrol plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to blind Server-Side Request Forgery in versions 1.17.0 to 1.19.1 via the 'wp_remote_request' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| A vulnerability classified as critical was found in cloudfavorites favorites-web up to 1.3.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function getCollectLogoUrl of the file app/src/main/java/com/favorites/web/CollectController.java. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| The Skitter Slideshow plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2 via the /image.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
