Export limit exceeded: 17028 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 419433 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 419433 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (4101 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-14443 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in ose-openshift-apiserver. This vulnerability allows internal network enumeration, service discovery, limited information disclosure, and potential denial-of-service (DoS) through Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to missing IP address and network-range validation when processing user-supplied image references. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64178 | 1 Jellysweep Project | 1 Jellysweep | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Jellysweep is a cleanup tool for the Jellyfin media server. In versions 0.12.1 and below, /api/images/cache, used to download media posters from the server, accepted a URL parameter that was directly passed to the cache package, which downloaded the poster from this URL. This URL parameter can be used to make the Jellysweep server download arbitrary content. The API endpoint can only be used by authenticated users. This issue is fixed in version 0.13.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0474 | 1 Invoiceninja | 1 Invoice Ninja | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High |
| Invoice Ninja is vulnerable to authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) allowing for arbitrary file read and network resource requests as the application user. This issue affects Invoice Ninja: from 5.8.56 through 5.11.23. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62155 | 1 Quantumnous | 1 New-api | 2026-04-15 | 8.5 High |
| New API is a large language mode (LLM) gateway and artificial intelligence (AI) asset management system. Prior to version 0.9.6, a recently patched SSRF vulnerability contains a bypass method that can bypass the existing security fix and still allow SSRF to occur. Because the existing fix only applies security restrictions to the first URL request, a 302 redirect can bypass existing security measures and successfully access the intranet. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9395 | 1 Wangsongyan | 1 Wblog | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in wangsongyan wblog 0.0.1. This affects the function RestorePost of the file backup.go. Such manipulation of the argument fileName leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51358 | 1 Linuxserver | 1 Heimdall Application Dashboard | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue in Linux Server Heimdall v.2.6.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted script to the Add new application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47190 | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low | ||
| Northern.tech Hosted Mender before 2024.07.11 allows SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0862 | 1 Proofpoint | 1 Enterprise Protection | 2026-04-15 | 5 Medium |
| The Proofpoint Encryption endpoint of Proofpoint Enterprise Protection contains a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to relay HTTP requests from the Protection server to otherwise private network addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54590 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| webfinger.js is a TypeScript-based WebFinger client that runs in both browsers and Node.js environments. In versions 2.8.0 and below, the lookup function accepts user addresses for account checking. However, the ActivityPub specification requires preventing access to localhost services in production. This library does not prevent localhost access, only checking for hosts that start with "localhost" and end with a port. Users can exploit this by creating servers that send GET requests with controlled host, path, and port parameters to query services on the instance's host or local network, enabling blind SSRF attacks. This is fixed in version 2.8.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11168 | 2 Python Software Foundation, Redhat | 2 Cpython, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low |
| The urllib.parse.urlsplit() and urlparse() functions improperly validated bracketed hosts (`[]`), allowing hosts that weren't IPv6 or IPvFuture. This behavior was not conformant to RFC 3986 and potentially enabled SSRF if a URL is processed by more than one URL parser. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54819 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| I, Librarian before and including 5.11.1 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to improper input validation in classes/security/validation.php | ||||
| CVE-2024-12867 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery in URL Mapper in Arctic Security's Arctic Hub versions 3.0.1764-5.6.1877 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exfiltrate and modify configurations and data. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12989 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability was found in WISI Tangram GT31 up to 20241214 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42965 | 2026-04-15 | 4.1 Medium | ||
| SAP CMC Promotion Management allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate internal network systems by submitting crafted requests during job source configuration. By analysing response times for various IP addresses and ports, the attacker can infer valid network endpoints. Successful exploitation may lead to information disclosure. This vulnerability does not impact the integrity or availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42907 | 2 Sap, Sap Se | 2 Businessobjects Bi Platform, Sap Business Objects Business Intgelligence Platform | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| SAP BI Platform allows an attacker to modify the IP address of the LogonToken for the OpenDoc. On accessing the modified link in the browser a different server could get the ping request. This has low impact on integrity with no impact on confidentiality and availability of the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40595 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Sma1000 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface. By using an encoded URL, a remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially cause the appliance to make requests to unintended location. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13879 | 2 Wordpress, Xwp | 2 Wordpress, Stream | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| The Stream plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.2 due to insufficient validation on the webhook feature. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3192 | 1 Spatie | 1 Browsershot | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| Versions of the package spatie/browsershot from 0.0.0 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the setUrl() function due to a missing restriction on user input, enabling attackers to access localhost and list all of its directories. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41668 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics provides visualization, analysis, and download of large-scale cancer genomics data sets. When running a publicly exposed proxy endpoint without authentication, cBioPortal could allow someone to perform a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack. Logged in users could do the same on private instances. A fix has been released in version 6.0.12. As a workaround, one might be able to disable `/proxy` endpoint entirely via, for example, nginx. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41664 | 1 Thinkst | 1 Canarytokens | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Canarytokens help track activity and actions on a network. Prior to `sha-8ea5315`, Canarytokens.org was vulnerable to a blind SSRF in the Webhook alert feature. When a Canarytoken is created, users choose to receive alerts either via email or via a webhook. If a webhook is supplied when a Canarytoken is first created, the site will make a test request to the supplied URL to ensure it accepts alert notification HTTP requests. No safety checks were performed on the URL, leading to a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. The SSRF is Blind because the content of the response is not displayed to the creating user; they are simply told whether an error occurred in making the test request. Using the Blind SSRF, it was possible to map out open ports for IPs inside the Canarytokens.org infrastructure. This issue is now patched on Canarytokens.org. Users of self-hosted Canarytokens installations can update by pulling the latest Docker image, or any Docker image after `sha-097d91a`. | ||||