| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. Prior to versions 2.2.23, 3.1.21, and 3.2.6, Rack::Static determines whether a request should be served as a static file using a simple string prefix check. When configured with URL prefixes such as "/css", it matches any request path that begins with that string, including unrelated paths such as "/css-config.env" or "/css-backup.sql". As a result, files under the static root whose names merely share the configured prefix may be served unintentionally, leading to information disclosure. This issue has been patched in versions 2.2.23, 3.1.21, and 3.2.6. |
| Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties, Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in Hallo Welt! GmbH BlueSpice (Extension:NSFileRepo modules) allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs, Bypassing Electronic Locks and Access Controls.This issue affects BlueSpice: from 5.1 through 5.1.3, from 5.2 through 5.2.0.
HINT: Versions provided apply to BlueSpice MediaWiki releases. For Extension:NSFileRepo the affected versions are 3.0 < 3.0.5 |
| NEXTWEB (i)Site stores databases under the web document root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a direct request to databases/Users.mdb. |
| Istio is an open platform to connect, manage, and secure microservices. Prior to 1.29.1, 1.28.5, and 1.27.8, a vulnerability in Envoy RBAC header matching could allow authorization policy bypass when policies rely on HTTP headers that may contain multiple values. An attacker could craft requests with multiple header values in a way that causes Envoy to evaluate the header differently than intended, potentially bypassing authorization checks. This may allow unauthorized requests to reach protected services when policies depend on such header-based matching conditions. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.29.1, 1.28.5, and 1.27.8. |
| ZKTeco ZKAccess Professional 3.5.3 contains an insecure file permissions vulnerability that allows authenticated users to escalate privileges by modifying executable files. Attackers can leverage the Modify permission granted to the Authenticated Users group to replace executable binaries with malicious code for privilege escalation. |
| EverSync 0.5 contains an arbitrary file download vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive files by requesting them directly from the files directory. Attackers can send GET requests to the files directory to download database files like db.sq3 containing application data and credentials. |
| AshPostgres is the PostgreSQL data layer for Ash Framework. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.4.10, in certain very specific situations, it was possible for the policies of an update action to be skipped. This occurred only on "empty" update actions (no changing fields), and would allow their hooks (side effects) to be performed when they should not have been. Note that this does not allow reading new data that the user should not have had access to, only triggering a side effect a user should not have been able to trigger.
To be vulnerable, an affected user must have an update action that is on a resource with no attributes containing an "update default" (updated_at timestamp, for example); can be performed atomically; does not have `require_atomic? false`; has at least one authorizer (typically `Ash.Policy.Authorizer`); and has at least one `change` (on the resource's `changes` block or in the action itself). This is where the side-effects would be performed when they should not have been.
This problem has been patched in `2.4.10` of `ash_postgres`. Several workarounds are available. Potentially affected users may determine that none of their actions are vulnerable using a script the maintainers provide in the GitHub Security Advisory, add `require_atomic? false` to any potentially affected update action, replace any usage of `Ash.update` with `Ash.bulk_update` for an affected action, and/or add an update timestamp to their action. |
| Files or directories accessible to external parties issue exists in SS1 Ver.16.0.0.10 and earlier (Media version:16.0.0a and earlier). If exploited, uploaded files and SS1 configuration files may be accessed by a remote unauthenticated attacker. |
| The web portal on airpointer 2.4.107-2 was vulnerable local file inclusion. A malicious user with administrative privileges in the web portal would be able to manipulate requests to view files on the filesystem |
| Lack of file validation in do_update_vps in Avast Business Antivirus for Linux 4.5 on Linux allows local user to spoof or tamper with the update file via an unverified file write. |
| Three Bitnami Helm charts mount Kubernetes Secrets under a predictable path (/opt/bitnami/*/secrets) that is located within the web server document root.
In affected versions, this can lead to unauthenticated access to sensitive credentials via HTTP/S. A remote attacker could retrieve these secrets by accessing specific URLs if the application is exposed externally. The issue affects deployments using the default value of usePasswordFiles=true, which mounts secrets as files into the container filesystem. |
| A vulnerability exists in Sitecore Experience Manager (XM), Experience Platform (XP), Experience Commerce (XC), and Managed Cloud that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to read arbitrary files. This vulnerability affects all Experience Platform topologies (XM, XP, XC) from 8.0 Initial Release through 10.4 Initial Release and later. This issue affects Content Management (CM) and standalone instances. PaaS and containerized solutions are also affected. |
| A directory traversal vulnerability exists in ColoradoFTP Server ≤ 1.3 Build 8 for Windows, allowing unauthenticated attackers to read or write arbitrary files outside the configured FTP root directory. The flaw is due to insufficient sanitation of user-supplied file paths in the FTP GET and PUT command handlers. Exploitation is possible by submitting traversal sequences during FTP operations, enabling access to system-sensitive files. This issue affects only the Windows version of ColoradoFTP. |
| The GLPI Inventory Plugin handles various types of tasks for GLPI agents, including network discovery and inventory (SNMP), software deployment, VMWare ESX host remote inventory, and data collection (files, Windows registry, WMI). Versions prior to 1.5.0 have an improper access control vulnerability. Version 1.5.0 fixes the vulnerability. |
| NVIDIA Installer for Windows contains a vulnerability where an attacker may be able to escalate privileges. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to escalation of privileges, denial of service, code execution, information disclosure and data tampering. |
| Local File Inclusion vulnerability in Ready's attachment upload panel allows low privileged user to provide link to a local file using the file:// protocol thus allowing the attacker to read content of the file. This vulnerability can be use to read content of system files. |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Shenzhen Sixun Software Sixun Shanghui Group Business Management System 4.10.24.3. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /ExportFiles/. The manipulation results in files or directories accessible. The attack may be launched remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| An information-disclosure vulnerability exists in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT application prior to version 7.7.0 that allows external access to the resources in certain admin root folders. |
| A vulnerability was found in Mercury MNVR816 up to 2.0.1.0.5. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the file /web-static/. The manipulation leads to files or directories accessible. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.80). Affected devices do not properly limit the path accessible via their webserver. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to read arbitrary files from the filesystem of affected devices. |
